theGreenOrange
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure what part you are missing so let me lay out my evidence. If you design a 4" frame with a stacked camera similar to the 180mm 5" designs, you can without a doubt, at a minimum, reduce the frame to 165mm [edit: 155 really, oops]. Then add in the savings from 30.5mm stack to 20mm stack and that gets you to about 160mm [edit: likely less].
Then factor in the reduced dead weight in the form of stack weight, wire weight for motors and battery pigtail, etc, etc... That is what efficiency is made of my friend. Maybe you won't believe until you start seeing 4" quads winning 5" class races, but prepare yourself mentally. It is coming. Micro CCD cameras are a big help too.
Then factor in the reduced dead weight in the form of stack weight, wire weight for motors and battery pigtail, etc, etc... That is what efficiency is made of my friend. Maybe you won't believe until you start seeing 4" quads winning 5" class races, but prepare yourself mentally. It is coming. Micro CCD cameras are a big help too.
Last edited: